Klaus Schwab, at the height of the ongoing epidemic, said: "The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, rethink and overload our world."
The civilized world is what
Civilization is an image of a special humanity on a separate earth, which is created due to the common history, traditions, customs, language, and religious beliefs.And more: A civilization is a cultural community of people with a certain social genotype, social stereotype, which has mastered a large autonomous, closed world space, and therefore has received a strong place in the world community.
That is, there are different civilizational groups of people on earth, which differ from each other in a number of ways. However, in the generally accepted sense in the world community, as a rule, the civilization of the modern era, When it comes to the civilized world, usually refers to the world of the countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OPEC). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international economic organization of developed countries (Western countries) that recognize the principles of representative democracy and a free. These are 39 countries out of 195 UN member states. This group of countries, Western Europe, North America, Japan, Australia and New Zealand have designated themselves as developed and civilized, taking as a standard of lifestyle and development the North American way of life, based on unlimited consumption of goods and services, sometimes useless and even harmful to human health and the environment. That is, the propaganda of these countries claims that only they are civilized countries, the rest are underdeveloped, developing, third world countries, etc. At the same time, according to the majority of the population of these countries, the rest of the world should strive for their consumer lifestyle, and who does not agree, they try to draw into their orbit by force. Although it is clear that all this has a completely different meaning. The population of Western countries, wishing to continue to live at the expense of all the resources of the rest of the world (labor, material, energy, information). Under the beautiful slogans formulated by their elites of so-called human rights (although I constantly violate them without looking back), the OECD countries, led by the US hegemon, continue to actively impose their civilizational way of life on all other inhabitants of the Earth, declaring themselves developed countries.
DevelopedDeveloped countries are also called industrial countries or industrially developed[2]. According to the IMF, as of 2023, advanced economies produce 57.3% of world GDP at face value and 41.1% of world GDP at purchasing power parity (PPP).
Imposed concept on the world: civilized
So what is this notion of a civilized (Western) world imposed on the world? Without going into historical details, we can say that this is a world built on plunder and for the last 500 years it has been providing its relatively high standard of living – consumption, at the expense of other countries of the world. These countries are labeled: developing, underdeveloped, overseas territories, colonies, third world, etc. etc. Although, we note that all countries of the world are members of the UN and formally have equal rights both in the UN and in the international arena. After the discovery of America by Columbus of America in the late 15th century AD (The first expedition (1492-1493) of Christopher Columbus consisting of 91 people on the ships “Santa Maria”, “Pinta”, “Nina” left Palos de la Frontera on August 3, 1492, from the Canary Islands turned West (September 9), crossed the Atlantic Ocean in the subtropical zone and reached the island of San Salvador in the Bahamas Archipelago, where Christopher Columbus landed on October 12, 1492. This is the official opening date of America). The development of the territory and its unrestrained plunder began, due to which Spain actually turned into a huge empire with possessions in North and South America. An active competitor to it at this time was the United Kingdom and other European countries. The redivision of the world began, the plundering of colonies in Africa and Asia, the struggle for the Spanish inheritance. As a result, colonial powers emerged, such as the British Empire, over which the sun never set. At the end of the 18th century, the English colonies in North America revolted and formed the United States of America(the United States of America was formed in 1776 with the unification of thirteen British colonies that declared their independence. Note that the real reason for the revolt of the colonies of England lay in the sphere of control over financial flows. As James Madison, the main author of the US Constitution, has argued: “History shows that money changers have used every possible form of abuse, intrigue, deception, and violence to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” Another founder, Thomas Jefferson, put it this way :” I truly believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken away from the banks and returned to the people to whom it rightfully belongs.” As Adam Smith remarked in his classic Study of the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,published in 1775:”Everything for ourselves and nothing for others seems an impossible task in every age of the world.” they were a vile maxim of the masters of humanity.”
The War of Independence lasted until 1783 and ended with the victory of the colonists. In 1787, the U.S. Constitution was adopted. After the First World War, a new hegemon emerged on the world stage – the United States, which, after going through a series of crises and even famine (In American history there is a crime against its own people-this is the Great American Holodomor of the same ill-fated 1932/33 year, as a result of which the United States did not count millions of its citizens.) a superpower, imposing on the world, according to the Brayton Woods Agreement, control over global financial flows and world trade with the help of the dollar. One of the founders of the current global banking system, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, is supposed to have argued: “Give me the ability to printmoney and I don’t care who writes the laws!”. Imagine: you have a printing press at home. Your business is to printmoney. The neighbors do not have such a machine, they are forced to produce various goods. You produce money that you use to buy your neighbors ‘ goods. For example, Russia produces and sells non-renewable oil, gas and much more, and in return receives green wrappers printed in the United States. A clone of the Euro dollar has similar properties. Thus, with the help of the rules of world trade imposed on the world, by and large, the owners of the printing press, the EU countries and the USA have the opportunity to receive material benefits, mainly engaged in various services that provide the full range of problems and issues related to world trade in material goods and financial instruments. So, the US GDP consists of 70% of so-called financial services, while the real economy’s GDP is less than 20%. That is, with a population of just over 4 % of the global population, it consumes about a third of all resources in the world. As of August 2023, the US national debt is approaching $ 33 trillion. This is about a third of the global public debt, that is, the total amount of government debt of all states.
America has been running a steady budget deficit since 2002, spending more than it earns. At the same time, the debts of the US population exceeded $ 60 trillion.
The reason for this situation is that the government and the population of the States are used to living on a grand scale. That’s what they borrowed money for. In 2022, the European Union’s debt totaled approximately 13.27 trillion euros. A similar picture in the euro area: total gross debt from 2012 to 2022 (in trillions of euros).
Thanks to the Fed’s 0.75% rate hike, the largest in nearly 30 years, and the promise of further increases, the US central bank has now guaranteed the collapse of not only the US debt bubble, but also most of the post-2008 $ 303 global debt. a trillion. (
Since the beginning of the 21st century, most countries of the world have realized the perniciousness of the lifestyle imposed by the West, based on their civilizational choice. As a result, an open conflict has emerged, the resolution of which humanity will have to go a long way for many years.
It will be necessary to solve Hamlet’s question: To be or not to be?
What do today’s rulers of the world prepare for the population of the Earth
Discussing the fate of tomorrow at various levels, the self-appointed world leaders, how they feel about themselves, at various levels, starting with the UN, we are talking about sustainable development until 2030, total zero until 2050, decentralization, decarbonization, digitalization, global warming, climate change, world hunger and so on. At the same time, all this takes place under the tacit influence of global financial groups and multinational companies with the active support of the liberal governments of the SES countries led by the United States. At the same time, voicing absolutely correct things and ideas, often there is a substitution of concepts, when the consequence is designated as the goal. Having taken as a basis, as an ideal to which all countries should strive, the so-called democratic society of the Western model, and you will be happy. What you need: A Big Transition, a Big Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Sustainable Development, and so on. Various terms are used, but the essence is the same: The New World Order.The idea of a New World Order grew out of the business idea of John D. Rockefeller, which originated around 1900.
One of the most accurate definitions of the new world order was givenJens Jerndal,MD, Master of Economics, in the article
Where did this “New World Order” coup come from? Rockefeller’s “Social Engineering Project”September 10, 2023:
The New World Order (NMP) is a social engineering project that aims to transform human civilization on planet Earthin all its aspects in order to satisfy the selfish interests of a small group of billionaires obsessed with power and profit. But they are also – and no less-obsessed with the fear of cruel, hungry and destitute masses looting and destroying their property. They seek to demonstrate how superior they are to 99.99% of their fellow humans, as well as their ability to defeat Nature, the Universe, and Divine Consciousness in the eternal game of Creation.
Let’s add that this is just Satanism.
The Western consumer lifestyle based on a currency that is not backed by real assets (dollar, euro) is taken as a model of happiness. This society without morals and restrictions, the main goal of which is to make a profit and unlimited consumption, is designated by self-styled reshals as a civilized one, which everyone should strive for under the slogans of human rights and freedoms formulated on the basis of Lutheranism (Protestantism). So the SER countries are civilized countries, and all the others are not. It should be noted that the formulated program of the great transition is also filled with pseudo-communist ideas like: you will have nothing (deny ownership) and you will be happy, as we will give you a basic income even if you do not work, mark cash, vaccinate for health and chip for your own convenience, settle you in a 15-minute city and give you eco-friendly artificial food from chemical reactors and insects and so on. All this is accompanied by rampant false propaganda that has nothing to do with the real state of affairs. “A person believes in anything because they have been trained to believe it.”Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
The actual objective of the New World Order project is a caste world. At the same time, it is not mentioned that consumption, freedom of movement, and freedom to choose one’s own fate will be restricted. So who will manage all this? And here’s who: a few hundred multinational companies and the high society of the golden million were not chosen by anyone. This is the highest society – the highest caste, the rest of the people are servants of a couple of hundred million people, residents of non-civilized countries, servants. Another population must disappear in order for paradise to reign on Earth, since man is declared the most dangerous creature for the natural environment, which must be preserved and protected, including from people. So the program is running. Its first stage is Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. In fact, we are talking about a new world order where to move according to Klaus Schwab and his associates from the WEF (Davos) with the help of the technology of the big transition, having implemented the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. (literature Books by Klaus Schwabe and Noah Herari)
The ultimate goal is to gain power over the entire planet and subjugate them to a limited number of people who will remain living slaves.
Caste world-a crowd-elite society like the world of Orwell, Huxley and others
A caste world is a society in which people are divided into different castes or classes based on their social status and the function they perform in society. This type of world of Orwell, Huxley, and other great writers is a popular subject in science fiction literature. These books often cover themes of social inequality, control over the people, and loss of identity within such caste-based societies. Some of them raise questions about individual freedom and the possibility of changing the social order. Some examples of such caste worlds in the literature are:
George Orwell’s 1984 is a novel about a brutal totalitarian dictatorship, where people live and work in strictly regulated castes in accordance with the political and social norms of the party.
“Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley is a book about a future society where people are also divided into different castes according to their level of intelligence and the functions they perform in society. Each caste goes through genetic and psychological controls to maintain social stability.
“The Wheel of Time” by Robert Jordan-this epic fantasy cycle reveals a world where people are also divided into different castes by profession and function. Rich and powerful castes rule society, while other castes live in poverty and oppression.
A caste world, worlds of Orwell and Huxley, is a society where people are divided into castes or classes based on their status and function in society. In such a world, all life and social relations are determined by belonging to a certain caste. Some of the castes are privileged and control power and resources, while other castes are less privileged and may experience exploitation and discrimination. The world of Orwell, the author of “1984”, represents a dictatorial society, where the division between the proletariat and the party elite is acute. In this world, castes are strictly controlled and regulated by the state, which establishes a strict hierarchy and suppresses any attempts at change and mobility between castes. In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, we encounter a technocratic society where people are divided into castes based on their genetic modification. Each caste has its own specialized roles and functions, determined by their intellectual and physical potential. In both of these worlds, there is strict control and manipulation of individuals to maintain the existing social structure and prevent the possibility of mobility or withdrawal from the assigned status. Caste worlds like those of Orwell,Huxley, and others often serve as a critique or warning of the potential dangers of such societies and shed light on the importance of freedom, equality, and diversity in society.
Tolpo-Elite Society
A crowd-elite society is a concept that describes a society in which there is a division between the “crowd” and the “elite”. This idea suggests that society is divided into two main groups: the majority (the crowd) and the minority (the elite). In this answer, we will look at the key aspects of this concept.
Main characteristics of a crowd-elite society
Power sharing: In a crowd-elite society, power and resources are concentrated in the hands of a small group of people or institutions that make up the “elite”. These individuals or organizations can control economic, political, and social resources.
Inequality: In such a society, there is a high level of social and economic inequality between the elite and the crowd. The elite have considerable wealth and privileges, while the mob has limited access to resources.
Limited access to decision-making structures: Crowd members usually have limited influence over decision-making structures in society, such as government, business, and financial institutions. All key decisions can be made by the elite.
Class struggle: A crowd-elite society can suffer from conflicts and class struggles. The crowd may seek to change the status quo and fight for a more equal distribution of resources and power.
Figure 2. Crowd-elite society A source: https://fishki.net/anti/1849950-tolpo-jelitarnoe-obwestvo-ili-kak-nami-upravljajut.html
Criticism and discussions
Opinion on inevitability: Some critics believe that the concept of a crowd-elite society is too simplistic and does not take into account the complexity and diversity of social structures. They argue that there are many different ways to organize society and power.
Sociological theories: Many sociological theories explore various aspects of power and inequality in society, and the concept of a crowd-elite society can be considered as one of many models.
Changes over time: A society can evolve over time, and power and influence can shift between different groups. Historical research shows that societies often go through periods of changes in the distribution of power.
The concept of a crowd-elite society is one of the models for analyzing social structures and power in society. Its value lies in the fact that it helps researchers understand the dynamics of power and inequality, but it is necessary to take into account the diversity of approaches to studying society and its structures.
Tolpo-“elitism”
The term “crowd-elitism” is a combination of two concepts: “crowd” and”elitism”. It is usually used to describe a situation where ordinary people (the crowd) and the elite (elite groups) find themselves in conflict or disagreement with each other.
A crowd in this context can refer to a mass society, ordinary citizens who do not have high social status, political power, or significant wealth. The crowd usually represents the majority of the population.
Elite refers to a small group of people who have high social status, power, wealth, or special privileges. The elite can include political leaders, corporate tycoons, academic and cultural figures, and so on.
Crowd-elitism can occur in various areas of society, such as politics, economics, culture, and education. It can manifest itself in the form of conflicts of interest between the masses and the elite, as well as in criticism of the actions of the elite by the crowd, which believes that the elite does not take into account their interests and needs.
This term can be used both to analyze social phenomena and to characterize certain political or social movements aimed at protecting the interests of the masses and reducing the influence of the elite.
We are determined to bring prosperity to the world, so that all people can live in prosperity and well-being, and that economic, social and technological progress continues in harmony with nature,” reads the UN General Assembly’s resolution adopted on September 15, 2015, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It is based on the Western model of life order, based on the robbery of the main part of the world in favor of the countries of the SER based on the Brunton Woods system with the help of a dollar bill that has not been secured since 1973. The principles of action of the world community for the foreseeable future fully correspond to the Western civilizational model of development, which was formulated according to the liberal patterns of mostly non-public groups associated with multinational companies and financiers who intensified their activities after the destruction of the USSR. “By the way, more than 400 years have passed, and the style of relations with peoples that civilized Europeans consider not civilized has not changed. So Manhattan, on May 24, 1626, was bought axes with trinkets for a total of 60 guilders ($24.00 – at the then exchange rate or $700.00-at the present time(Indians, how much is your Manhattan? https://archytector.livejournal.com/13821.html Пишет archytector (archytector) 2016-05-24)
It doesn’t remind me of anything. And let’s see what the deception of big perestroika, the green agenda, decarbonization, digitalization, decentralization of the fourth industrial revolution, pandemics, digital currency, sustainable development and so on is based on. In conclusion, we note that the global crisis of the existing system of civilizational development of the world, which everyone is talking about, manifests itself in various guises at the global level in all spheres of human activity in the form of socio-economic troubles, famine and wars, and the decline of morals. The deep state is fighting for the right of parasitic existence, only not a fall, but a deliberate destruction of morals, not a struggle for resources, but a war for them without restrictions of morals and law. Fueling conflicts around the world is waging a war for access to resources including natural, geographical, intellectual and generally human. So only the unity of all sane people can get rid of this trouble.
Donald Trump Should Not Repeat Woodrow Wilson’s Failure
April 30th is an important date in American politics. This is the day 100 for the American President in the White House, and all attention will be on the reports of his achievements and failures. But nothing can be more critical than Peace…
○
6 mins read
A Holocaust perpetrator was just celebrated on US soil. I think I know why no one objected.
Russia’s invasion has made ordinarily outspoken critics of antisemitism wary of criticizing Ukrainian Nazi collaborators
○
1 min read
Qi Book Talk: The Culture of the Second Cold War by Richard Sakwa
Richard Sakwa has for many years been one of the most distinguished and insightful observers of relations between the West and Russia, and one of the leading critics of Western policy. In this talk with Anatol Lieven, director of the Eurasia program at the Quincy Institute, Sakwa discusses his book, The Culture of the Second Cold War (Anthem 2025). The book examines the cultural-political trends and inheritances that underlie the new version of a struggle that we thought we had put behind us in 1989. Sakwa describes both the continuities from the first Cold War and the ways in which new technologies have reshaped strategies and attitudes.