The nuclear age inaugurated by U.S. bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 almost reached its deadly culmination in October 1962, but Kennedy and Khrushchev prevailed over the militarists in both camps and found a diplomatic solution. Mature statecraft led to an agreement to respect each other’s security interests. Russia removed its nuclear weapons from Cuba, and the USA followed suit by removing its Jupiter nuclear missiles from Turkey and Italy soon thereafter while promising not to invade Cuba.
Kennedy created several precedents for future leaders to learn from, starting with his Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1963, his plans to halt the U.S. invasion of Vietnam, his vision for a U.S.-Soviet joint space program, and his dream of ending the Cold War.
We are now sitting on the cusp of the 60th anniversary of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Sadly, very few statesmen in today’s world think on the strategic level of President Kennedy by trying to understand the world through the eyes of their adversaries.
In that sense, we must recognize the legitimate security interests of both Russia, which has long viewed NATO expansion as an existential threat, and Ukraine, which justifiably deserves freedom, peace, and territorial integrity. There are no viable and humane military solutions to the present conflict. Diplomacy is the only way out.
Beyond simply putting out the immediate fires threatening to engulf our collective home, a longer-term plan to avoid future fires from taking hold is also necessary. To this end, cooperation on matters of common interest is vital to establishing new security architecture founded upon firm principles. This means seeking out projects that unite the goals of eastern and western blocks into a shared destiny, rather than amplifying divisions of “us” vs. “them” with “good guys” invited to democracy summits that exclude nearly half of the world’s population.
Today’s statesmen must discuss climate change, search for new energy sources, respond to the global pandemics, close the gap between rich and poor; these are but a few examples from a nearly limitless available list.
If humanity is to survive the current storm, it will have to rethink the geopolitical assumptions that have dominated throughout recent history and search for universal collective security rather than the unipolar domination that has prevailed since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The good sign is that Russia and Ukraine continue talking and achieving some limited progress but, unfortunately, with no breakthroughs, as the humanitarian catastrophe inside Ukraine worsens. Instead of sending more western weapons and mercenaries to Ukraine, which adds fuel to the fire and speeds the race towards nuclear annihilation, the U.S., China, India, Israel, and other willing nations serving as honest brokers who must help to negotiate in good faith to resolve this conflict and eliminate the danger of nuclear extinction that threatens us all.
Watch the video with the music and images to complement this appeal.
11 mins read
A March 29 article on America’s involvement in the war in Ukraine in The New York Times by Adam Entous “reveals that America was woven into the war far more intimately and broadly than previously understood.” “Understood” is a euphemism. It means the American and global public were lied to.
2 mins read
Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky has admitted that his “hatred” of Russians is one of the driving forces propelling him to “keep going” in the conflict against Moscow.
2 mins read
In February, IPD USA organized a symposium where leading foreign policy experts examined how the Trump administration could broker a diplomatic settlement between Russia and Ukraine. Since then, President Trump has actively pushed to bring the Ukraine war to an end, resulting in some positive developments. While fighting continues, both Russia and Ukraine have verbally agreed to an immediate ceasefire. More significantly, there is now a real prospect for normalized U.S.-Russia relations, especially after U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed the idea of a U.S. security guarantee or NATO membership for Ukraine. This essential step, later affirmed by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, removed a major source of tension between Russia and the West.
