Pundits predict that Biden will officially start a war with Russia in 2024. Yes, it's possible. But it will take a 'Pearl Harbor' type of event, which Ukrainian militants can organize.
Under Biden, the U.S. has become the leading force for Armageddon
With each passing day the human race moves closer to the abyss. We’re sleep-walking into Armageddon, and not many people take the threat seriously, or even seem to care.
This danger is compounded by the fact that the ruling class in the West believes a historic moment is at hand — it finally has the economic and military power to subdue Russia and seize control of Eurasia. This dream began with Napoleon in 1812 and was then embraced by Hitler in 1941. Today, NATO is the heir to this malevolent western ambition.
For western liberal regimes, a victory over Russia would open up tremendous economic and social engineering opportunities. But even more important is the ideological component — to create an invincible Fourth Reich that will usher in a new era of utopian ‘progress’ and social control.
Imagine the exhilaration that our ruling class now feels pulsating through their veins. Thanks to technology and the power of the mass media, they have a godlike ability to brainwash, manipulate and harness the masses to build their New Order. The Nazis didn’t have even a small fraction of the resources that our ruling class now possesses.
And once again, Russia stands in their way.
So far, the West has only engaged in a proxy war against Russia using Ukrainian soldiers who have proven ineffective. Over the course of a three-month offensive, they’v only advanced a few miles, losing tens of thousands of men, as well as hundreds of NATO tanks and other vehicles. In fighting Ukraine, Russia has handed NATO its most disgraceful defeat in the alliance’s 75-year history.
U.S. troops in Romania, preparing to fight Russia
Eventually, the U.S. and other NATO allies will have to intervene directly. No matter how often NATO leaders deny this, the fact remains that direct intervention is necessary to defeat Russia. The Ukrainians are clearly unable and unwilling to complete the task to destroy Russia.
And why should they? The two Slavic neighbors share much in common and have little reason to hate and fight each other. Many Ukrainians are native Russian speakers and Orthodox Christian believers. Their faith calls for people to love each other and to live in peace.
From the very beginning, since 2014 when a violent insurrection in Kiev brought a far-right nationalist regime to power, this conflict has had roots in Washington and London. The U.S. is trying to escalate this war, but the Kremlin has been careful not to give NATO a reason to invoke Article 5, which would plunge all of Europe into war.
And since the Kremlin hasn’t taken NATO’s bait, the White House will have to manufacture a crisis, a type of ‘Pearl Harbor’ event that will outrage all Americans and form a national consensus for war with Russia, with the naive hope that it can be contained to a conventional war.
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in December 1941 after President Roosevelt called for an oil embargo on Japan. At that time, the U.S. was the world’s largest oil producer and the embargo meant certain death for Japan, an island nation with few natural resources. Tokyo had been backed into a corner and attacked the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor out of desperation. These facts, however, only became known many decades later. In December 1941, the attack on Pearl Harbor was presented to the American people as an unprovoked “sneak attack”.
Destruction of the USS Maine (Feb 15, 1898)
U.S. history has many other contrived and manufactured crises that were used as an excuse to start a war. A munitions accident that destroyed the USS Maine (Feb 15, 1898) in Havana Harbor (Cuba) was used as a pretext by the U.S. to invade the Spanish Empire. And in summer 1964, false accusations of a military incident in the Gulf of Tonkin were used to unleash war against Vietnam.
The U.S. is already de facto at war with Russia; the next logical step is to make the conflict official. If Vladimir Putin is really Hitler, as U.S. propaganda outlets tell us, then we will eventually have to wage an epic battle to “Make the World Safe for Democracy”. There’s no other choice.
Last week, the popular American pundit Tucker Carlson predicted that the White House will start a full-fledged war with Russia as a way for the Democrats to win the presidential election in November 2024. He’s right. During wartime, presidents enjoy a sharp boost in popularity, and an official declaration of war against Russia would allow the White House to suspend Constitutional liberties and crush the opposition, which it’s already trying to do.
Carlson, however, didn’t specify how exactly the U.S. would officially go to war with Russia. A ‘Pearl Harbor’ type of event will be needed and most likely it will be the handiwork of Ukrainian militants. I expect that the perpetrators will come from the far-right Azov Battalion. And, of course, Russia will be blamed.
Azov Battalion in Kiev — far right militants who are praised by the White House
Such an attack will be against a highly visible target — perhaps on Times Square, or at a Disney park, or during the Super Bowl. The attack must be sufficiently horrendous to generate anger across the political spectrum and garner full national support for a crusade against the Russian ‘barbarians’. The major media will be obedient to the White House, stoking the flames of war instead of asking tough questions and investigating.
Ukrainian militants already have much experience at organizing terrorist attacks, and recently they’ve been openly bragging about such crimes that have taken the lives of many innocent people.
“There were many different operations. We’ll be able to speak about some of them publicly after the victory; but we will not talk at all about others,” recently said Vasyl Malyuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). “One of our actions was the destruction of the Crimean Bridge on Oct 8 last year.”
The Crimea Bridge was badly damaged when a truck loaded with explosives blew up, igniting a train carrying oil and killing three people. Neither the U.S. nor a single NATO country condemned the Ukrainian terrorist attack. NATO has since supported dozens of Ukrainian terrorist attacks, mostly done with drones.
The Crimean Bridge burns in Oct 2022
Each of these audacious Ukrainian terrorist attacks truly astonishes with their level of daring, determination and blood-thirstiness. They are carried out by desperate and psychotic people who are capable of doing anything and committing any crime.
Will Ukrainian militants really be brought to the U.S. to cause death and destruction, acting with the direct support and approval of the White House and the most nefarious elements of our secret services? Yes, I think it’s possible. We should not underestimate the lengths to which these people will go to maintain power and continue their war against Russia.
The White House has already sent more than 400,000 Ukrainian soldiers to their deaths in its proxy war, and so, it can easily stomach a terrorist attack on U.S. soil that will justify full-fledged war with Russia. In their minds, the end justifies the means. And their goal, as they have clearly stated, is to destroy Russia.
We have reached the most pivotal moment in modern history, where ‘winner takes all’. There can only be one left standing. This war ends with either a total Russian victory, or a total American victory.
Donald Trump Should Not Repeat Woodrow Wilson’s Failure
April 30th is an important date in American politics. This is the day 100 for the American President in the White House, and all attention will be on the reports of his achievements and failures. But nothing can be more critical than Peace…
○
6 mins read
A Holocaust perpetrator was just celebrated on US soil. I think I know why no one objected.
Russia’s invasion has made ordinarily outspoken critics of antisemitism wary of criticizing Ukrainian Nazi collaborators
○
1 min read
Qi Book Talk: The Culture of the Second Cold War by Richard Sakwa
Richard Sakwa has for many years been one of the most distinguished and insightful observers of relations between the West and Russia, and one of the leading critics of Western policy. In this talk with Anatol Lieven, director of the Eurasia program at the Quincy Institute, Sakwa discusses his book, The Culture of the Second Cold War (Anthem 2025). The book examines the cultural-political trends and inheritances that underlie the new version of a struggle that we thought we had put behind us in 1989. Sakwa describes both the continuities from the first Cold War and the ways in which new technologies have reshaped strategies and attitudes.