If Ukraine is truly committed to human rights, it must uphold its freedom of religion 

The Ukrainian government must rethink this dangerous legislation, and the governments that are appropriately supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty must ensure that the Ukrainian peoples’ human rights do not become a further victim of this war. 

Born out of the horrors of WWII, the international human rights system has held the freedom of religion as sacrosanct. This essential freedom to worship is guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Art. 18), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Art. 18), and the European Convention on Human Rights (Art. 9), among others. It is at the center of a system that protects the integrity of the human person, the right to think and to believe. As history has made all too clear, when the right to freedom of religion is undercut, all other human rights are in peril. 

A sufficient number of parliamentarians have voiced their support to move forward with a vote on the legislation that has been on the Rada’s docket since January. More than 250 members have signed on to the legislation; only 226 votes are required to pass. As a formal matter, the bill will amend Ukraine’s existing legislation guaranteeing freedom of religion by stipulating that “Activities of religious organizations that are affiliated with the centers of influence of a religious organization, the governing center of which is located outside of Ukraine in a state that carries out armed aggression against Ukraine, are not allowed.” 

This means the law will ban the operation of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), a branch of Ukrainian Orthodoxy followed by at least 16 percent of the Ukrainian people. Historically, and as a matter of canonical legitimacy, the UOC was subordinated to the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church. In 2018, the Ukrainian government sought the establishment of a new Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) with ties to Constantinople, rather than Moscow. In January 2019, the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople approved this new branch, which remains the preferred church of the Ukrainian government. However, for reasons of religious history and tradition, millions of ordinary worshipers have remained loyal to the UOC.  

Despite its historic ties to Russian Orthodoxy, the UOC has stood firmly in support of Ukraine’s rightful self-defense against Russia’s aggression. The day after the invasion, the UOC’s leader, Metropolitan Onufry, declared the church’s opposition to the war and repeatedly appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin to reverse course, stating, “To our great regret, Russia has started military actions against Ukraine. … In this tragic time we express special love and support for our soldiers, who stand guard to defend our land and our people.” In May 2022, the UOC officially amended its constitution, severing its ties with the Moscow Patriarchate. 

While Putin has instrumentalized the Russian Orthodox Church as a tool of influence in what he calls the “Russian World,” the UOC is now fully separate — as a matter of law and practice — from Moscow. Nevertheless, a Ukrainian governmental commission, including only members of the government’s preferred church, found that separation insufficient. As a result, the new law will shutter the UOC, banning its operation outright on Ukrainian soil. 

The legislation currently before parliament is just the most brazen of a series of attacks on the church. According to the U.S. State Department 2022 Religious Freedom Report, the Security Service of Ukraine carried out 41,000 investigations against the UOC for allegedly collaborating with Russia and searched 350 church buildings. In December 2022, sanctions were announced against seven more senior members of the UOC, including Metropolitan Pavel Lebid, the vicar of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. In March 2023, authorities attempted to expel UOC clergy from Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra monastery. Criminal charges — often without any foundation — have been brought against church leaders and parishioners. 

These attacks on the UOC are a grave violation of human rights. The Ukrainian Parliament is well aware of the path it is on. In fact, parliamentarians have amended the pending legislation by removing a critical passage that would have ensured compliance with human rights law.  

The Rada has struck a line requiring the law to operate “in accordance with the norms of international law in the field of freedom of conscience and Ukraine’s obligations in connection with joining the Council of Europe.” By removing this language, the Rada has drafted a bill that undercuts the freedom of religion and the respect for human rights. Notably, the Rada’s own expert committee report found the law deeply problematic, lacking due process and not requiring any showing that the OUC threatens Ukrainian national security. 

The Government of Ukraine has prided itself on compliance with international law and the preservation of human rights since Russia’s February 2022 invasion. In fact, Ukraine has successfully differentiated its own conduct from that of Russia based on its strict adherence to the law. Speaking to the U.N. General Assembly, President Volodymyr Zelensky observed that “mankind and the international law are stronger than one terrorist state” and noted that “UN Charter stipulates the value of human rights, dignity and life, and we also stipulate them.” The Ukrainian Ministry of Justice has described its “legal confrontation with the Russian Federation” as “lawfare,” whereby it is undertaking a “comprehensive and coordinated legal defense of our rights and interests.” 

The brazen effort to shutter the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and curtail the freedom of religion currently being contemplated by the Ukrainian parliament undermines these commitments and Ukraine’s claims to the higher legal and moral ground. Ukraine must correct course; its western supporters must ensure that Ukraine prevails both on the battlefield and its commitment to rights and law. 

William W. Burke-White is professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School.