The US risks embarrassing itself and its intelligence if Russia chooses an option other than invasion

How we can emerge from crisis without war.

Time and again, Putin’s words have been twisted or misconstrued in a way that fits and reinforces western preconceptions.

How much do you know about the crisis in Ukraine? See if you can answer these 7 questions.

This week our top story is on the formal U.S. response to Russian demands over Ukraine and European security, and how the Kremlin might respond. We also look at why scientists and journalists are raising questions about the efficacy of the coronavirus vaccine EpiVacCorona, and how geopolitics are driving the Russian markets.

Rather than examining the perspective of Russian national security interests, U.S. officials wrongly think the fate of European peace is in the hands of a single man: Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, writes Scott Ritter.

Perceptions are likely growing in the West that Moscow is dispensing of empty threats and ultimatums on Ukraine

The eagerly awaited “written response” from the U.S. and NATO to Russia’s security proposals is now in the hands of President Vladimir Putin. And yet there is no sign the West caved in on Moscow’s insistence that NATO rescind its 14 year-old invitation to Ukraine to join NATO.

The ‘western’ media buildup for war in Ukraine was launched 63 days ago on November 22.

Putin’s Munich speech was an important diplomatic warning to the United States and its allies that Russia’s patience with NATO’s encroachment was at an end.