Why Did the Great American Artist, James Whistler, Claim to Be ‘Born in Russia’?

In 1842, Jamie’s father George, a highly regarded engineer, was hired by Nicholas I to supervise the building of a railroad from St Petersburg to Moscow through 400 miles of rugged terrain. The project would require the building of 200 bridges and nearly 70 viaducts. In addition, he would also be responsible for manufacturing 2,580 freight cars, 162 locomotives, and 70 passenger cars. His compensation for this monumental undertaking would be a staggering  12,000 dollars annually plus a semi-official position at the Russian court!

 As a result, young “Jamie” came to St. Petersburg with his family at the age of eight, and left with his mother and siblings in 1847, when the threat of cholera forced them to move to London, where he would spend most of the rest of his life. In Russia, he began his study of painting, first with the private tutor Alexander Koritsky and then, at the age of 11, he was admitted to the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts where he was taught by Ivan Vistelius and Ivan Voinov. What Whistler, then, was referring to above is the fact that the artist Whistler was born in Russia. In recognition of Whistler’s contribution to Russian and Western art, the Tretyakov Gallery in Russia presented an exhibition “Whistler and Russia” as part of its 150th anniversary. Acknowledging the importance of Whistler in the history of Art, the American government and British council contributed significant sums of money to make this exhibition possible. In Britain, a fair number of Whistler’s works are well known.

In America, however, Whistler is really only known to the public because of one painting. It is, no doubt, another irony of history that someone whose social identity was shaped by the choices and professions of his father and father’s father would become famous by one single painting of his mother.