The ‘Kellogg Plan’ looks totally unacceptable to Moscow in its leaked form, but it’s still good to talk

The list of Trump’s team members is long, so let’s concentrate on a short list of “troika” candidates who deal with foreign affairs and national security, starting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

WASHINGTON, Dec 4 (Reuters) – Advisers to Donald Trump publicly and privately are floating proposals to end the Ukraine war that would cede large parts of the country to Russia for the foreseeable future, according to a Reuters analysis of their statements and interviews with several people close to the U.S. president-elect.

The list of Trump’s team members is long, so let’s concentrate on a short list of “troika” candidates who deal with foreign affairs and national security.

About a quarter of a century ago around this very time, a newly elected Republican president who campaigned on a promise of a more humble, less arrogant foreign policy was assembling his foreign policy and national security team. By the time he was finished, even the new president’s critics had to agree that the team he had assembled was an impressive one.

Andrew Napolitano: “There is no doubt that the United States is waging war with Russia — without a decision by Congress as mandated by Constitution, and without the consent of the United Nations.”

The White House recognises that negotiations to end the conflict are inevitable, but it wants to delay the day of judgment.

The title of this article is a question worth asking. The Biden administration’s decision giving permission to Ukraine to fire ATACMs into Russian territory, despite clear warnings from Putin that this would be considered as a US attack on Russia, raises the legitimate question, “What the hell are they trying to do?”

President-elect Donald Trump is inheriting a blood-soaked war in Ukraine. He has pledged to put a swift end to the carnage.

The speed of his cabinet nomination announcements tells us that the Republican president-elect has a plan