The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, the mainstream media’s leading apologist for the Pentagon’s use of force and the Central Intelligence Agency’s covert action, has done it once again. For the past two years, he has regularly predicted victory for Ukraine because the United States or the European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have delivered one particular weapons system or another. This time around, Ignatius’ oped argues that the “game changer” in the war is the “newly arriving ATACM-300 long-range missile.”

The passage by Congress of the latest aid package to Ukraine was met with cheers, but there is ample reason for caution.

While the Biden administration claims to be “defending democracy” in Ukraine, its role there has caused political upheaval from Kyiv to Washington. A Ukrainian insider reveals new details.

Professor John Mearsheimer talks with Judge Napolitano about the current state of the war in Ukraine.

The accepted Western narrative is that, in February 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine with the intent of conquering the entire country. But there is a competing narrative that is compelling enough to be worthy of consideration.

Retired Colonel Douglas Macgregor said Donald Trump has aligned himself ‘with the money pigs in Washington’ by supporting the bill to send billions of dollars to war efforts overseas.

There are problems money can’t fix.

Ukraine’s American-backed fight against Russia is being waged not only in the blood-soaked trenches of the Donbas region but also on what military planners call the cognitive battlefield – to win hearts and minds.

The American brand will suffer so long as Washington pretends its capacities are limitless.

What difference will the passing of the enormous $95 billion aid package for Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel make? A very great deal But none of it in the way expected and predicted.